Federal Insider: Sequester spin gets ahead of reality

If you have difficulty viewing this newsletter, click here to view as a Web page. Click here to view in plain text. Thursday, February 28, 2013 Sequester spin gets ahead of reality Karen Tumulty and Lyndsey Layton How bad will the cuts really be? No one really knows. The dire warnings the reflect a lot of guesswork. More headlines In the Loop: A multilingual secretary Study: Child porn sentencing uneven Duncan says teachers getting pink slips but local officials say not so Furlough questions and answers The Federal Eye How are some agencies avoiding furlough likelihood? Furlough Friday: 10 questions and answers Homeland Security official quits after agency releases immigrants On Leadership Prudence Bushnell on being a diplomat Tom Fox "If nobody's in charge or cares, then you get policy disasters like Rwanda." Federal Player Managing emergency services at the Grand Canyon National Park The Partnership for Public Service Brandon Torres has a huge responsibility — ensuring the safety of more than five million people who visit the Grand Canyon National Park every year. Interactive What the sequester would mean The White House has released state-by-state reports on some of the programs and services that would be impacted under the March 1 sequestration cuts. Get The Washington Post, your way. Want to stay on top of the latest news, features, commentary and more? Here's how: Mobile: Alerts: Social Media: Applications Web site E-mail SMS RSS Feeds Facebook Twitter SEND TO A FRIEND UNSUBSCRIBE E-NEWSLETTER CENTER GET HELP Washington Post Digital E-mail Customer Care 1150 15th Street NW Washington, D.C. 20071 ©2013 The Washington Post Privacy Policy