Bob McDonnell, Once One of the GOP’s Rising Stars, Heads to the Courthouse



National Review


Today on NRO

THE EDITORS: Pro-lifers haven't suffered a final defeat. An Enduring Wrong.

SENATOR ROB PORTMAN: Roe v. Wade denies the most basic rights to the unborn child. The March for Life Goes On.

JONAH GOLDBERG: The New York governor's recent remarks show just how close-minded liberals can be. Cuomo the Intolerant.

KEVIN D. WILLIAMSON: The New Jersey governor's promise to end the war on drugs is worthy. Christie's War.

GEORGE WEIGEL: Ukraine becomes a thugocracy as Washington and Brussels stand by. Grim News from Ukraine.

BETSY WOODRUFF: CNN's new contributor, no fan of Obama and Clinton's, puts herself squarely in the Warren camp. Sally Kohn, Populist Progressive.

Morning Jolt
. . . with Jim Geraghty

January 22, 2014

Bob McDonnell, Once One of the GOP's Rising Stars, Heads to the Courthouse

Bob McDonnell, you're a big jerk.

Here's one detail from the indictment that's just heartbreaking if you ever thought Bob McDonnell had a bright future as a leader on the national stage:

On or about August 1, 2011, MAUREEN MCDONNELL also met privately with JW (presumably McDonnell donor and Star Scientific CEO Jonny Williams). During the meeting, MAUREEN MCDONNELL noticed JW's watch and asked what brand it was. JW informed her it was a Rolex. She informed JW that she would like to get one for ROBERT MCDONNELL because he would like a Rolex. JW expressed concern regarding whether ROBERT MCDONNELL would actually wear such a luxury watch given his role as a senior government official. MAUREEN MCDONNELL told JW that she wanted JW to buy a Rolex for ROBERT MCDONNELL. JW subsequently bought a Rolex for ROBERT MCDONNELL. When JW contacted MAUREEN MCDONNELL to ask her what she wanted engraved on the watch, MAUREEN MCDONNELL instructed JW  to have "71st Governor of Virginia" engraved on the back of the Rolex.

If these points in the indictment are accurate, even Jonnie Williams -- the guy allegedly bribing the McDonnells with these gifts and loans seemed to sense this was a bad idea. McDonnell earned $175,000 per year as governor one of the highest salaries of any governor and obviously doesn't have to worry about paying rent while he's governor. But the Rolex cost $6,500. That's a pretty hefty chunk of change for a timepiece. People would inevitably ask questions about how he could afford it.

It sounds like the McDonnells had well-hidden financial issues from the moment they entered the governor's mansion. In December 2009, one month after McDonnell wins in a landslide, Maureen McDonnell e-mails "JE," one of Robert McDonnell's senior staff members:

"I need to talk to you about Inaugural clothing budget. I need answers and Bob is screaming about the thousands I'm charging up in credit card debt. We are broke, have an unconscionable amount in credit card debt already, and this Inaugural is killing us!! I need answers and I need help, and I need to get this done."

Painful lesson: You never really know a candidate or public official unless you're in the innermost of inner circles. Little or nothing in Bob McDonnell's past as state attorney general or state legislator pointed to an extravagant lifestyle, serious personal debts, or blind spots in judgment. Even if you know a candidate . . . you never really know how power will change him.

Someone asked how much of this mess is the responsibility of Maureen McDonnell, and how much is the fault of the governor. That doesn't really matter much, now does it? He's the governor. He's got to know that if he's going to accept a gift, he has to disclose it. He's got to have the basic common sense to realize that one guy offering more than $150,000 in loans and gifts isn't just doing it because he's a nice guy. And if his wife is getting him involved in financial arrangements that appear compromising, he's got to put his foot down and get himself out.

The legal response from McDonnell's lawyers citing me! Thanks a heap, guys!* is that governors get gifts from donors all the time, and that no matter how awful it stinks, nothing actually breaks federal law.

But part of me can't believe they've been reduced to arguing this:

All that Governor McDonnell is alleged to have done for Star or Mr. Williams was facilitate two meetings with Virginia Health and Human Resources officials (who gave Star nothing but a little of their time), make a brief appearance at a Star event in Richmond, attend a private luncheon hosted by his wife (and paid for by his PAC) at the Governor's mansion at which Star announced the award of research grants to two Virginia universities, and attend a large healthcare reception at the Mansion to which his wife had invited a few Star representatives (invitations indistinguishable from those extended to thousands of other people over the Governor's time in office).

Yeah, that's all!

The Commonwealth of Virginia does not provide its governor a mansion so that he can help donors sell their products, and we don't elect these guys so they can suddenly become enormously popular with rich guys who want to share their vacation homes and buy them watches. You can't cash in on your office and if the argument is that every elected official does it, you can't do it on this scale.

*This is sarcasm.

Toughen Up, Beltway

By 11 p.m. Monday night, most of the school districts in the Washington, D.C., area announced they were closed in anticipation of an approaching "Alberta Clipper" snowstorm.

Tuesday morning, the federal Office of Personnel Management announced that federal government offices in the D.C. region would be closed. Emergency employees and telework-ready employees are expected to work.

The first snowflakes didn't fall until about 11 a.m. At 1 p.m., most of the major roadways remained clear, with the salt trucks having had plenty of time to prepare the roads. The clipper did amount to a genuine snowstorm by the standards of the mid-Atlantic region, dumping four to seven inches.

My suspicion is that the Washington, D.C., area is a lot more capable of toughing its way through a few inches of snow. We would like to try, but nervous-Nelly school administrators won't let us. Either that, or those administrators are terrified of nervous-Nelly parents.

Jake Tapper: "When I was a kid they waited for snow to accumulate before they called snow days. Then we had to walk home in it barefoot with bags of rocks."

The AP wrote that the U.S. is becoming a nation of "weather wimps," attributing it to . . . global warming, contending that the warmer globe means we're less used to cold weather, so we have a harder time coping with it. That article featured a Rutgers University climate scientist positing that melting Arctic sea ice is generating "more weirdness" in our weather. That darn indecipherable, precise scientific jargon!

But this isn't really about the actual temperatures or precipitation; it's about how we react to them. Winter's always going to be cold, ranging from pretty cold to bitterly cold. Some years we won't get much snow, some years we'll get a blizzard or two. What's stupefying is how this region always seems shocked by it.

Washington, D.C.,'s snow accumulation this year (before Tuesday's Alberta Clipper) was . . . 3.4 inches. Not counting Tuesday's school closure, Yuppie Acres, Northern Virginia has already used up its three snow days and had a delayed opening, and that district's school closure decisions are about par for the course in the region. The annual usual total snowfall in the Washington, D.C., area is . . . 5.4 inches. So we're getting a bit more snow than usual, but not much.

(You can check out snowfall totals and averages for 57 cities here.)

Washington Post's Petra Dvorak spoke for exasperated parents a few weeks ago when there was talk that some school districts would close school because of the "Polar Vortex." No actual precipitation, snow, sleet, or ice, just a blast of really cold air.

A cold day has no resemblance to the glory of an actual snow day — where the rinse-and-repeat cycle of getting all the snow pants, hats, mittens on, then going outside to play, then fighting and screaming because snow went down someone's back and someone else got smacked with an iceball, then going home for hot chocolate — makes the day feel Sysiphean, but makes it go by faster.

A bitterly cold day?

Let's crack an egg on the sidewalk and watch it freeze? Test that "Christmas Story" tongue scene?

Nah. This is our big chance to show the rest of the country that flintiness that President Obama longed for when he moved here from Chicago and learned his daughters' school had closed because of a dusting of snow.

It's time for the folks of Our Town to show the government how to keep functioning despite a deep freeze, how to hunker down, wear an extra layer and get it done.

Please? For the sake of parents?

Perhaps it is memories of the January 2011 "Carmaggeddon'" that haunt administrators in the D.C. region. But even that storm was relatively mild five to ten inches but it caused colossal problems because of the timing of its arrival in the mid-afternoon. The federal government dismissed its workers, and every commuter in Washington, D.C., tried to leave simultaneously clogging every artery out of the city.

I spent six hours in traffic on Carmaggeddon, on a drive that can take twenty minutes on a weekend. But what really aggravated the problems of that night were the little gestures of petty incivility, such as the private and city buses that completely blocked and gridlocked city intersections because they just had to inch ahead on the yellow lights, or the guy who abandoned his car in the middle lane of the 14th Street Bridge. Thanks, pal. Carmaggedon was one of the few times my four-wheel-drive light SUV looked better than the Porsches and sports cars abandoned by the side of the road. The natural obstacles were greatly exacerbated by very human misbehavior.

Human beings are capable of walking, driving, and functioning in snow; otherwise places like Boston, Buffalo, Cleveland, and Minneapolis (and Canada) would be abandoned throughout winter. But not only does Washington, D.C., fail to do that… it seems afraid to even try.

That Awful Governor Boo Burnham

Peggy Noonan:

It is astonishing and cannot go unremarked that Mississippi's Gov. Frank "Boo" Burnham, the conservative who won a 2011 landslide, gave an interview Friday in which he demonstrated all that is wrong in American politics — all its division, its intolerance, its ignorance and sickness. Burnham damned and removed from the rolls of the respectable everyone in his state who is pro-choice, who is for some form of gun control, and who supports gay marriage. In a radio interview marked by a tone of smug indignation and self-righteousness, Burnham said "extreme liberals" who are "for abortion, who hate guns, who want homosexuals to marry — if that's who they are they're the extreme liberals, they have no place in the state of Mississippi because that's not who Mississippians are."

         
Now, you're a smart audience. You guys know Boo Burnham doesn't exist, right? And you know which other governor said remarks that were the same, except ideologically reversed, right?

Noonan describes the reaction to New York's Andrew Cuomo as thus:

Conservatives: "Wow, he really sees us this way?"

Mainstream press: "Sure he does. That's how we see you, too. Where's the story?"

ADDENDUM: Texas Democrat Wendy Davis, in a release attacking her GOP rival, Greg Abbott:

I am proud of where I came from and I am proud of what I've been able to achieve through hard work and perseverance. And I guarantee you that anyone who tries to say otherwise hasn't walked a day in my shoes.

Abbott, of course, is a paraplegic.


To read more, visit www.nationalreview.com


Why not forward this to a friend? Encourage them to sign up for NR's great free newsletters here.

Save 75%... Subscribe to National Review magazine today and get 75% off the newsstand price. Click here for the print edition or here for the digital.

National Review also makes a great gift! Click here to send a full-year of NR Digital or here to send the print edition to family, friends, and fellow conservatives.


Facebook
Follow
Twitter
Tweet
3 Martini Lunch
Listen
Forward to a Friend
Send

National Review, Inc.


Manage your National Review subscriptions. We respect your right to privacy. View our policy.

This email was sent by:

National Review, Inc.
215 Lexington Avenue, 11th Floor
New York, NY 10016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Megyn Kelly -> Pete Hegseth responds to 2017 rape accusation. 🔥

FOLLOW THE MONEY - Billionaire tied to Epstein scandal funneled large donations to Ramaswamy & Democrats

The Blackburn Report: Merry Christmas & Happy New Year!