Morning Jolt
. . . with Jim Geraghty July 9, 2014 Obama Administration Decides NOW Is a Good Time to Denounce Israel An abominably dumb policy towards Israel may not crack the top ten worst Obama policies during this presidency . . . but that's just because of fierce competition from letting veterans die, the forced cancellation of health-insurance plans, higher insurance premiums, a recovery that never feels like an actual recovery, the collapse of Iraq, the looming collapse of Afghanistan, playing footsie with Tehran, a "reset button" that only generated more open Russian aggression, runaway debt . . . But we shouldn't forget that our president and his team seem ferociously and irrationally, critical of Israel — even as rockets rain down on their heads. In an unusually harsh major foreign policy address, Philip Gordon, a special assistant to US President Barack Obama and the White House coordinator for the Middle East, appealed to Israeli and Palestinian leaders to make the compromises needed to reach a permanent peace agreement. Jerusalem "should not take for granted the opportunity to negotiate" such a treaty with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, who has proven to be a reliable partner, Gordon said. "Israel confronts an undeniable reality: It cannot maintain military control of another people indefinitely. Doing so is not only wrong but a recipe for resentment and recurring instability," Gordon said. "It will embolden extremists on both sides, tear at Israel's democratic fabric and feed mutual dehumanization." Buddy, are you even paying attention to what's gong on outside the conference hall? Hostilities between Israel and Palestinian militants were intensifying Wednesday, with more rockets launched toward Israel and war planes carrying out airstrikes on sites in Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip. The Israel Air Force targeted 160 sites in Gaza since midnight Tuesday after militants from the Palestinian territory fired more than 225 rockets into southern and central Israel on Monday and Tuesday, according to the Israel Defense Forces. On Tuesday night the militants expanded their attacks, which had been focused on southern Israel, to the center of the country. Residents of Jerusalem and Tel Aviv -- Israel's two largest cities — were forced into bomb shelters at the sound of air-raid sirens. Yes, America does have a dog in this fight, because one side is apparently executing American citizens: Three Israeli teenagers who were abducted by Palestinians in the occupied West Bank last month were shot at least 10 times with a silenced gun in what appeared to be premeditated killings, a U.S. official involved in the investigation said. The disclosure clashed with speculation by some Israeli and Palestinian commentators that the captors intended to take hostages for a prisoner exchange but panicked and shot them. The killing of the three Jewish seminary students followed the collapse of U.S.-brokered peace talks in April. One of them, 16-year-old Naftali Fraenkel, also held American citizenship. Checking in on the Year's Most Important Political Fight: Retaking the Senate Over on the home page today, a roundup of the Senate races — the circumstances are good for Republicans, but there's been a real lack of fresh polling in most of the big races. Those races in North Carolina, Louisiana and Arkansas aren't looking like slam-dunks yet . . . National Journal's Charlie Cook — a.k.a., the other one — asks if Democrats are starting to tell themselves that losing the Senate wouldn't really be that bad: Early this year, we saw Senate Democrats throw their House brethren under the proverbial bus with a Jan. 29 story in Politico headlined, "Democrats: Cede the House to Save the Senate." It noted that Democrats' hold on their majority in the upper chamber was tenuous, while over on the House side, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee was raising money hand over fist despite having little chance of reclaiming the majority House Democrats lost in 2010. It didn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that Senate Democrats were trying to redirect fundraising from what they saw as a lost cause on one side of the Capitol to what they saw as a much more important one on their side . . . We saw it again this past week with the Washington Post's inimitable Dana Milbank writing a column July 4 suggesting that perhaps the Obama presidency might benefit from Democrats losing their Senate majority. The crunching sound you heard was the bones of Senate Democrats under a bus, a pretty fair indication that someone in or close to the White House was beginning to rationalize why such an outcome might not be as bad a thing as some might think — all logic to the contrary. Identifying Those Relatively Apolitical Americans with Conservative Instincts There's a demographic out there that I can describe but not label. These folks are instinctively conservative, but probably don't apply that label to themselves. They work for a living, or they are looking for work. They can't stand what they perceive as whining. But they don't identify with the Republican Party. They look at the leadership of the party, at least in Washington — House Speaker John Boehner, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, RNC Chair Reince Priebus — and don't feel any sense of connection to them. In fact, they don't really relate to or connect with any particular politician. They either tune out politics as much as possible, or they find the political process to be dominated by adults acting like children and bickering in a selfish, obstinate manner. One reason they don't feel any particular attachment to the current crop of Republican leaders — or perhaps the last Republican presidential standard-bearer, Mitt Romney — is that they're suspicious, or at least wary of Wall Street, or most big companies. They may work for a big company but they don't feel a particular loyalty or identification with their employer. These folks might sound like potential Tea Partiers, but at some point, these folks either tuned out the Tea Party or got turned off by some of the more fiery rhetoric. The tea-party rallies almost inevitably feature somebody dressed up in Revolutionary War garb, and that's not who they are. 
Some people will see this as cute, some will see it as silly.
However, Common Core drives them nuts because they don't understand the homework their kid is bringing home. They feel sorry for all of the children from Central America coming over the border right now, but they don't feel that taking care of those kids should be America's duty. When these folks get galvanized, it's more often by a figure outside the political arena who articulates a conservative value. Think of Tim Tebow, or Dr. Ben Carson, or Dirty Jobs host Mike Rowe — soon to return to CNN — lamenting America's lawsuit-minded culture and the loss of a sense of shame. Or Gene Simmons of Kiss, arguing that it's silly to demonize the rich, important to assimilate immigrants, and to stand by Israel in the Middle East. Or Adam Carolla, raging against political correctness . . . It's weird that comedians are on the list of people who are offending other people with the things they say. It's counterintuitive. It's like — I think every year Variety or The Hollywood Reporter or one of those magazines comes out with a list of celebrities or notables that hate the gay community. Whatever it is. I was on that list, because in 2011 I made a joke about Chaz Bono. Jesus Christ, if you can't joke about Chaz Bono, then we're all through! They had Tracy Morgan, several of the people on the list were comedians. And when did this start up? They're comedians, onstage, making jokes! They may mean it half the time, but they're still making jokes, why are they held to the same standard as statesmen? Here's Nicole Curtis, host of Rehab Addict on HGTV, in a February Facebook post: In the past couple of weeks, I have had a few unpleasant experiences with women who actually had the nerve to state that they are a minority business owner (because they are a woman) and that should do what? This is where I bang my head — I am a business owner who happens to be a woman -- don't judge me on my gender — judge me on my work — ladies — you want equal ground — gain it by being equal in professionalism and quality of work — not by making excuses that you are a small minority business owner. It brings the rest of us down. I scrubbed floors for 10 years and worked my rear off to get where I am at — don't think for a minute that I'm the person to whine to that you should be able to short step the process of dedication because you are a woman — last time I checked, I am too. We are all given opportunities when we put the time in and develop the drive — teach your daughters that that's how you get ahead — no entitlement here, please. Even a bit of chef-turned-TV-travelogue host Anthony Bourdain: In New York, where I live, the appearance of a gun – anywhere — is a cause for immediate and extreme alarm. Yet, in much of America, I have come to find, it's perfectly normal. I've walked many times into bars in Missouri, Nevada, Texas, where absolutely everyone is packing. I've sat down many times to dinner in perfectly nice family homes where — at end of dinner — Mom swings open the gun locker and invites us all to step into the back yard and pot some beer cans. That may not be Piers Morgan's idea of normal. It may not be yours. But that's a facet of American life that's unlikely to change. I may be a New York lefty — with all the experiences, prejudices and attitudes that one would expect to come along with that, but I do NOT believe that we will reduce gun violence — or reach any kind of consensus — by shrieking at each other. Gun owners — the vast majority of them I have met — are NOT idiots. They are NOT psychos. They are not even necessarily Republican (New Mexico, by the way, is a Blue State). They are not hicks, right wing "nuts" or necessarily violent by nature. And if "we" have any hope of ever changing anything in this country in the cause of reason — and the safety of our children — we should stop talking about a significant part of our population as if they were lesser, stupider or crazier than we are. It's almost as if the political arena delegitimizes the voices of its participants. But when a figure untainted by the 24-7 hypocritical rugby scrum that is our politics expresses what we would consider to be a conservative value, a lot of folks who aren't into politics applaud. Am I describing instinctively-conservative populists? Or is this the "libertarian populist" phenomenon described by Ben Domenech and Conn Carroll? ADDENDA: Thanks, Adam Bellow, for listing me as one of "21 Conservative Writers To Read At The Beach" over at BuzzFeed. Looking back on the book, while I feel confident that the work is funny, light, and fast-moving, there's one element of summer or beach reading that is missing: escapism. You know the drill: The Weed Agency is . . . $9.97 on Amazon, $7.99 on Kindle, $9.97 at Barnes and Noble, $9.99 on Nook, and IndieBound can steer you to an independent bookseller near you. . . . I'm scheduled to appear on Greta's panel tonight.
To read more, visit www.nationalreview.com
| Why not forward this to a friend? Encourage them to sign up for NR's great free newsletters here. Save 75%... Subscribe to National Review magazine today and get 75% off the newsstand price. Click here for the print edition or here for the digital. National Review also makes a great gift! Click here to send a full-year of NR Digital or here to send the print edition to family, friends, and fellow conservatives.
| 
Follow | 
Tweet | 
NR Podcasts | 
Send | National Review, Inc.
Manage your National Review subscriptions. We respect your right to privacy. View our policy. This email was sent by:
National Review, Inc.
215 Lexington Avenue, 11th Floor
New York, NY 10016 | 
Comments
Post a Comment