Obama Unveils New Plan to Work with Foreign Governments to Ignore the Constitution



National Review
 

Today on NRO

JONAH GOLDBERG: Sanitizing language about terrorists only works when people aren't paying attention. Call the Islamic State What It Is: Evil.

JIM GERAGHTY: Early-state GOP voters are particularly wary about expanding Medicaid. Expanding Medicaid.

IRA STRAUS: The Obama administration has caused or exacerbated most of the current problems in the Mideast. How Obama Caused ISIS.

THE EDITORS: "Economic patriotism" is a sensible tax code. Confiscatory Taxes, Eh?

SLIDESHOW: Movie Memories: The Wizard of Oz.

Morning Jolt
. . . with Jim Geraghty

August 27, 2014

President Obama's a big NBA fan, right? What if he's tanking this year of his presidency because he thinks he'll get a better lottery pick in the draft next year?

Obama Unveils New Plan to Work with Foreign Governments to Ignore the Constitution

You know why Obama seems so disconnected and disinterested in the presidency? Because he doesn't want to be president, he would rather be king:

The Obama administration is working to forge a sweeping international climate change agreement to compel nations to cut their planet-warming fossil fuel emissions, but without ratification from Congress.

In preparation for this agreement, to be signed at a United Nations summit meeting in 2015 in Paris, the negotiators are meeting with diplomats from other countries to broker a deal to commit some of the world's largest economies to enact laws to reduce their carbon pollution. But under the Constitution, a president may enter into a legally binding treaty only if it is approved by a two-thirds majority of the Senate.

 

 
Don't Miss the Conservative Event of 2014!
 

To sidestep that requirement, President Obama's climate negotiators are devising what they call a "politically binding" deal that would "name and shame" countries into cutting their emissions. The deal is likely to face strong objections from Republicans on Capitol Hill and from poor countries around the world, but negotiators say it may be the only realistic path.

"If you want a deal that includes all the major emitters, including the U.S., you cannot realistically pursue a legally binding treaty at this time," said Paul Bledsoe, a top climate change official in the Clinton administration who works closely with the Obama White House on international climate change policy.

Look at how these people speak. If you cannot get the Senate to ratify a treaty (technically, passing a resolution of ratification), then the United States is not a party to that treaty. Period. Full stop. The Constitution is not iffy on this. This part is not a suggestion. There is no wiggle room.

There are a lot of nonsensical or highly exaggerated chain e-mails accusing the president of working with foreigners to subvert the U.S. Constitution. But this time you've got the foreigners and administration officials themselves confirming it on the front page of the New York Times!

"There's a strong understanding of the difficulties of the U.S. situation, and a willingness to work with the U.S. to get out of this impasse," said Laurence Tubiana, the French ambassador for climate change to the United Nations. "There is an implicit understanding that this not require ratification by the Senate."

"The difficulties of the U.S. situation" is a reference the fact that we have a Senate that opposes the treaty.

The Times casually notes that President Obama ignored the legislative process in his domestic climate-change agenda, too:

In seeking to go around Congress to push his international climate change agenda, Mr. Obama is echoing his domestic climate strategy. In June, he bypassed Congress and used his executive authority to order a far-reaching regulation forcing American coal-fired power plants to curb their carbon emissions. That regulation, which would not be final until next year, already faces legal challenges, including a lawsuit filed on behalf of a dozen states.

". . . days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America . . ."

What if Hillary Made Her Silence Work for Her? And America?

Hillary Clinton's getting some grief about not saying much of anything about the racially-charged, controversial events in Ferguson, Missouri.

She's unlikely to ever be so deft to do this, but what if she explained that action -- which everyone attributes to political caution, calculation, cowardice, and disinterest -- and attempted to revise the expectations of the American people about what a political figure ought to do in these circumstances?

Sooner or later, she'll do another televised interview. And when asked about Ferguson, what if she said . . .

"I simply didn't think there was much value in having me, or any other politician, rushing into this tense situation and blathering for the cameras. Particularly for those first couple days and weeks, we just didn't know all the facts. Way too many people were determined to believe in their preferred narrative, of a 'gentle giant' gunned down by a bad cop or a good cop getting demonized for taking a necessary act of self-defense -- and not caring whether or not the facts confirmed that. All we know is that a man was killed, his family and friends are mourning, and a cop is waiting to hear if he will face a legal consequence. Perhaps we've all gotten conditioned to expect that when something controversial happens, politicians have to jump in, but there's not a lot we can say that isn't already obvious: Cops need to work to ensure they enjoy the trust of the communities they police. Authorities need to respect and protect citizens' First Amendment rights to protest. Rioting, property damage, and assault are unacceptable. This is basic stuff, and I'm not sure rushing out and issuing a statement would change the mind of anyone involved."

The Growing Genre of Campaign Ads Featuring Candidates Shooting Things

"I'm Alaskan Republican Senate candidate Dan Sullivan, and I will shoot the negative attack ads off your television."

How Many Unaccompanied Minors Did HHS Release to Sponsors in Your County?

Here's a nice way to localize a national issue:

Congressman Bill Cassidy (R-LA) denounced the Obama Administration's practice of sending illegal immigrants to Louisiana. The Obama Administration released state-by-state and county-level breakdowns of the number of illegal immigrants, showing there were 1,275 UAC released to sponsors in Louisiana between January 1 to July 31, 2014.

Parish-level breakdown of UAC in Louisiana:
East Baton Rouge Parish (Baton Rouge)- 173
Jefferson Parish (Southwest of NOLA)- 533
Lafayette Parish (Lafayette)- 51
Orleans Parish (New Orleans)- 237
St. Tammany Parish (Slidell, N. of NOLA)- 54
Total in Louisiana- 1,275

Cassidy released the following statement:

"The Obama Administration announced that more than 1,200 illegal immigrants have been placed in Louisiana. This highlights how President Obama's failure to secure the borders and properly enforce our immigration laws has impacted Louisiana. This crisis has further highlighted the inability of President Obama to lead on important issues. Senate Democrats are equally responsible. They left Washington without taking action. We must secure our borders and stop President Obama's executive amnesty."

That's aspiring-senator Cassidy, of course.

See how many unaccompanied border children HHS released to sponsors in your county here. For example, HHS announced they released 1,023 unaccompanied border children to sponsors in Fairfax County, Virginia.

ADDENDA: Hanging around the green room in Fox News' DC Bureau is every bit as cool as you would imagine. Last night, as the Special Report finished its segment on Russian forces crossing the border into Ukraine, Charles Krauthammer quipped, "It's because their GPS system wasn't in Cyrillic."

Later Oliver North told the story of going to a veterans convention, meeting a man who seemed like an enthusiastic fan who told him how much he enjoyed his books on World War II, and then being asked, "May I have your autograph, Mr. Brokaw?"

. . . Our Katherine Timpf has quickly staked out the "Am I Hallucinating" beat at NRO. Her past few stories have featured a Teletubby accused of sexual harassment and Title IX violations, feces in the hallway of an Environmental Protection Agency office, taxpayer-funded design-your-own-tattoo classes in Wales, and federal regulations protecting Americans from killer breath mints.

As the National Book Festival approaches, authors lament that Hollywood turns their novels inside out. Attention Hollywood producers: If you buy the rights to The Weed Agency, I will nod and smile when you passionately explain, "We've decided the character of Adam Humphrey should be replaced with an animated talking cow."

 

Join the 500-plus NR Post-Election Cruisers who've signed up for a glorious week with over 3 dozen conservative all stars, including VDH, Allen West, John Yoo, Ralph Reed, Jonah, Rich, Mona, Jay, Tim Pawlenty, Fred Thompson, Jon Kyl, and many more. Click here for details.


To read more, visit www.nationalreview.com


Why not forward this to a friend? Encourage them to sign up for NR's great free newsletters here.

Save 75%... Subscribe to National Review magazine today and get 75% off the newsstand price. Click here for the print edition or here for the digital.

National Review also makes a great gift! Click here to send a full-year of NR Digital or here to send the print edition to family, friends, and fellow conservatives.

Facebook
Follow
Twitter
Tweet
Subscribe
NR Podcasts
Forward to a Friend
Send

National Review, Inc.


Spring Fever



Order Today!


The Weed Agency: A Comic Tale of Federal Bureaucracy Without Limits

By Jim Geraghty

 

Manage your National Review subscriptions. We respect your right to privacy. View our policy.

This email was sent by:

National Review, Inc.
215 Lexington Avenue, 11th Floor
New York, NY 10016

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Megyn Kelly -> Pete Hegseth responds to 2017 rape accusation. 🔥

FOLLOW THE MONEY - Billionaire tied to Epstein scandal funneled large donations to Ramaswamy & Democrats

Readworthy: This month’s best biographies & memoirs