How Should 2016 Republican Candidates Talk About Iraq?
Do you feel differently about the Iraq War now than you did, say, five years ago? I find myself encountering men with artificial legs or arms with more regularity. I suppose it's entirely possible their injuries aren't from military service, or are from Afghanistan. But the point is there are roughly 32,000 men and women who came back from Iraq injured; 4,487 came back in flag-covered coffins. That is an extremely high price in American blood and far too many empty chairs at the Thanksgiving table. Our men and women fought valiantly and bravely . . . and Iraq . . . well, Iraq is a mess. It's not the fault of our troops; they did everything they could. There's plenty of blame to go around, from the Obama administration's determination to pull out all combat troops, to former Iraqi prime minister Maliki, to the choices of the Iraqi people and the governments of Iraq's neighbors. Regardless of how you feel about George W. Bush, the pre-war intelligence, Michael Moore, and the anti-war Left, or the opportunistic flip-floppers like Hillary Clinton and John Kerry, is there anyone who would argue that the price America paid in its battle in Iraq was NOT too high? Does anyone doubt that the electorate largely believes that military intervention in Iraq was an enormous mistake, costing ungodly sums of money and losing far too many fine men and women for a raging land of sectarian ingrates, who were so eager and willing to fight one another or our people trying to help them, but who fell apart and ran in the face of the Islamic State? At what point are we allowed to get angry at young men in Iraq who were given a chance to live in something better, freer, and more prosperous than the barbaric mad despotism they experienced under Saddam Hussein, and yet are throwing it all away to join the Islamic State? David Goldman: Fifty-three percent think Iranian nukes are a "major threat," and only 37% think they are a "minor threat." Most Americans, in short, think Iran is a major threat to American security and think that Obama's nuclear deal is a joke–but they still want Obama in charge of the negotiations, not us. Maybe NBC made the numbers up. Maybe a proofreader got the numbers reversed. And maybe pigs will sprout wings. There is a much simpler explanation: Most Americans don't trust Republicans on matters of war and peace. Not after the nation-building disasters in Iraq and Afghanistan, that is. Why should they trust us? Our leadership has never admitted it made a mistake. Sen. Ted Cruz, to be sure, had the gumption last fall to say that "we got too involved in nation-building" and that "we should not be trying to turn Iraq into Switzerland"–and was excoriated for his trouble by the Bushies. The Republican mainstream is too busy trying to defend the Bush record to address the distrust of American voters. One gets weary and grows shrill sounding the same note for a decade. I wish the problem would go away. A couple of weeks ago a friend who served in senior defense positions in the Bush administration remonstrated, "Why do we have to worry about what mistakes were made back then?" The American public doesn't remember a lot, but it does remember the disruption of millions of lives after the deployment of 2.6 million Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan–not to mention 6,000 dead, 52,000 wounded in action, and hundreds of thousands of other injuries . . . Republicans need a clear and simple policy about the use of force: We will use force only when we and our close allies are under threat. We will use the kind of force that least exposes Americans to harm. We will not sacrifice the time, let alone the lives, of American soldiers to fix the problems of other countries. Ohio governor John Kasich, appearing with Hugh Hewitt yesterday: Hugh Hewitt: Now let me ask you about Libya. We broke Libya. And yesterday, 900 people died fleeing that country. Did we owe that country more than a wave goodbye after Hillary's handoff from Qaddafi to the jihadists? John Kasich: Well, I mean, what you do mean by that? Should we have been there nation building? I mean, should we have landed troops over there? I don't know. I don't know. I mean, I think that you know, the problem has been that we have not been consistent in the Middle East and assertive. And that's been a problem for us. And when we went out of Iraq and didn't keep our base and didn't mind the store and didn't arm in the early stages the opposition to Assad, all these things have left us in a position of where see things falling apart. And you know, at this point in time, I can't tell you what I think we should do in Libya. I wouldn't tell you that I think we need to be putting troops in Libya. I wouldn't be for that. But you know, it's a result of some of the big miscalculations, and frankly, I guess you've got to start where you are. But I wouldn't be telling you we should put troops there. And later: Kasich: I don't think we should run out of Afghanistan. But you know, getting in the middle of civil wars, I don't think is a good idea. Hewitt: You're not saying Iraq when you say the first Gulf War and Afghanistan. Did President Bush make a mistake in invading Iraq? Kasich: I don't want to go back and redo that. I mean, it was there, and I don't want to disparage anybody who served our country. I'm just going to reserve my comment on that. Yo, Media: Cash for Influence Is a Pattern With the Clintons! Bill and Hillary Clinton sold out the Lincoln Bedroom for political donations; they sold pardons for donations later. Now we're supposed to believe that reports of trading influence and State Department policy changes for donations are laughable and far-fetched. Clinton, campaigning for the Democratic nomination in the liberal bastion of Keene, pushed back against accusations that foreign governments that made donations to the Clintons' charity received preferential treatment from the State Department while she served in the Obama administration. "We will be subjected to all kinds of distractions and attacks," she told reporters after a roundtable event at a wood furniture factory. "I'm ready for that. I know that that comes, unfortunately, with the territory." Dear media: You don't have to give her the benefit of the doubt on this! Or, at the very least, you can point out past times the Clintons have exchanged access and favors for money. Learn Some Fun Facts about the Guy Who Founded Earth Day Happy Earth Day, America! Ira Einhorn was on stage hosting the first Earth Day event at the Fairmount Park in Philadelphia on April 22, 1970. Seven years later, police raided his closet and found the "composted" body of his ex-girlfriend inside a trunk. A self-proclaimed environmental activist, Einhorn made a name for himself among ecological groups during the 1960s and '70s by taking on the role of a tie-dye-wearing ecological guru and Philadelphia's head hippie. With his long beard and gap-toothed smile, Einhorn — who nicknamed himself "Unicorn" because his German-Jewish last name translates to "one horn" — advocated flower power, peace and free love to his fellow students at the University of Pennsylvania. He also claimed to have helped found Earth Day. But the charismatic spokesman who helped bring awareness to environmental issues and preached against the Vietnam War — and any violence — had a secret dark side. You don't say! When his girlfriend of five years, Helen "Holly" Maddux, moved to New York and broke up with him, Einhorn threatened that he would throw her left-behind personal belongings onto the street if she didn't come back to pick them up. And so on Sept. 9, 1977, Maddux went back to the apartment that she and Einhorn had shared in Philadelphia to collect her things, and was never seen again. When Philadelphia police questioned Einhorn about her mysterious disappearance several weeks later, he claimed that she had gone out to the neighborhood co-op to buy some tofu and sprouts and never returned. It wasn't until 18 months later that investigators searched Einhorn's apartment after one of his neighbors complained that a reddish-brown, foul-smelling liquid was leaking from the ceiling directly below Einhorn's bedroom closet. Inside the closet, police found Maddux's beaten and partially mummified body stuffed into a trunk that had also been packed with Styrofoam, air fresheners and newspapers. After his arrest, Einhorn jumped bail and spent decades evading authorities by hiding out in Ireland, Sweden, the United Kingdom and France. After 23 years, he was finally extradited to the United States from France and put on trial. Taking the stand in his own defense, Einhorn claimed that his ex-girlfriend had been killed by CIA agents who framed him for the crime because he knew too much about the agency's paranormal military research. He was convicted of murdering Maddux and is currently serving a life sentence. Remember, environmentalists, always compost your murder victims! ADDENDA: My write-about-parts-of-the-candidates'-lives-that-no-one-else-has-yet agenda for 2016 pays off a nice dividend, with one article cited in David Brooks's New York Times column Tuesday: Rubio's inexperience concerns everybody. But at least he was speaker of the Florida House. As Jim Geraghty of National Review has detailed, his record running that body was pretty good. He was a tough but reasonably successful negotiator. On his first day in office, he handed each legislator a book with the cover "100 Innovative Ideas for Florida's Future." The pages were blank. He was inviting his members to fill them in — a nice collaborative touch. Happy Independence Day, Israel! The Israeli population is now 8.3 million; 6.2 million of those citizens are Jewish. | 
Comments
Post a Comment